WINA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Document Security Systems has a net margin of 45.42% compared to Winmark's net margin of --. Winmark's return on equity of -- beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

Winmark has a consensus price target of $445.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.33%. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Winmark has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe Winmark is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

Winmark has a beta of 0.563, which suggesting that the stock is 43.733% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Winmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Winmark pays 97.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winmark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Winmark quarterly revenues are $21.9M, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. Winmark's net income of $10M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, Winmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.05x while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winmark is 16.33x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Envela has a net margin of 45.42% compared to Winmark's net margin of 5.17%. Winmark's return on equity of -- beat Envela's return on equity of 14.21%.

Winmark has a consensus price target of $445.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.33%. On the other hand Envela has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 56.25%. Given that Envela has higher upside potential than Winmark, analysts believe Envela is more attractive than Winmark.

Winmark has a beta of 0.563, which suggesting that the stock is 43.733% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envela has a beta of 0.122, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.8%.

Winmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Envela offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Winmark pays 97.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Envela pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winmark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Winmark quarterly revenues are $21.9M, which are smaller than Envela quarterly revenues of $48.3M. Winmark's net income of $10M is higher than Envela's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Winmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.05x while Envela's PE ratio is 21.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winmark is 16.33x versus 0.84x for Envela. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 45.42% compared to Winmark's net margin of -3528.43%. Winmark's return on equity of -- beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Winmark has a consensus price target of $445.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.33%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 36.99%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Winmark, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Winmark.

Winmark has a beta of 0.563, which suggesting that the stock is 43.733% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.586, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.605%.

Winmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Winmark pays 97.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winmark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Winmark quarterly revenues are $21.9M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. Winmark's net income of $10M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Winmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.05x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winmark is 16.33x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of 45.42% compared to Winmark's net margin of --. Winmark's return on equity of -- beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Winmark has a consensus price target of $445.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.33%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Winmark has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Winmark is more attractive than Northann.

Winmark has a beta of 0.563, which suggesting that the stock is 43.733% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Winmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Winmark pays 97.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winmark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Winmark quarterly revenues are $21.9M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Winmark's net income of $10M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Winmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.05x while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winmark is 16.33x versus 0.32x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.